Quantcast
Channel: TechEye - Wikileaks is backed by lizards - Comments
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8

By: chameleon

$
0
0
Human intellect, which is not to be confused with Intelligence, operates through projecting to the future. Intellect therefore rationalises without referring to anything which is absolute like conscience, compassion, benevolence and morality. Rationality is what is being referred to in the article, oka associability, mistakened as logic. Intellect lacks absoluteness and it is through this deficiency that intellect is making up for “lost time” with “anything goes”. Logic is balanced/the attempt at balancing intellect - trying to maintain the credibility of intellect. Intellect has no credibility other than logic because it employs rationality/associability as its logic. That which is intelligent operates through the present whereas subjectivity/emotion/conditioning operates via the past [events] as in memory, nostalgia, romance, lovey-dovey, goody-2-shoes, sympathy and so forth whereas objectivity-projectivity/material-intellect operates through the future as in analysing, planning, cruelty, anger, greed, plotting, and so forth. It is this lack of connecting/demarcating the past, future and present which is the stumbling block in realising human [mis]behaviours and how/where to place/categorize certain aspects - all resulting in a jumbled mess of who sez what and why - exploited by one’s intellect through justification through whatever that seemingly will connect. If the above is true, the emotion/femininity and the material-intellect/masculinity are gone cases/sheer bankruptcies for there is no solution to blindness other than having sight - subjectivity and projectivity being not material whilst remembering that electro-magnetism is an aspect of the physical - in fact, electro-magnetism is the physical cosmos per se which is why it is dectectable by a radio [within specified spectrums]. Electro-magnetism/Material-Intellect is “Chi” [or “Prana”], regardless of whether Chinese/Indian [which are essentially the same - take away the mumbo-jumbo and the skin, and they are the same] culture realises so or not [whilst to add to their confusion, the “Chi” which permeates beyond the physical is Spirituality/”Pranava”. Almost all Chinese, especially their intellectuals, will not be able to relate what “Chi” truly is other than some hocus-pocus, mumbo-jumbo, airy-fairy]. This situation only applies to Humanity whereas within The Source, Divinity, all these realms are real and are “Enlightened” - Divinity of having no [need for] relativity. When Divinity is, say angry, oka gifting Benevolence through curtailing on-going destruction because the voices of morality are being heard, The Primordial Master, oka Poseidon [the Greek pantheon of gods is mostly true and accurate - the ancient Greeks only lost their reality {to myth} when they attempted to humanised/own their gods and were scattered and “diluted” as the result] as reflected in the oceans and seas, will issue a warning of sorts - the mandate of which was made before the physical dimension came into being. God as perceived by the religious of faith, is only A Witness to His Mandates/Aspects, oka The Rules & Regulations of Divinity in support of Truth, and these mandates, oka the Backdoor Key, are reflected within every human/Humanity the human being being merely a tenant to his body and not the owner otherwise there will not be mandatory physical death or illnesses - the pipe dream of intellect being to become the saviour to his imagination. Every so-called cure of psychosomatic and idiopathic illnesses will not be realised unless and until humanity realises that we are merely tenants to our body and start respecting it like a temple - not to save nor to worship but to become part thereof. Seen any art horder physically damaging his art “treasures”? No? so why are people damaging their body 25/8 in the manner of a quest? Because we have yet to realised that we do own our body but are actually the tenants. Seen any tenant treating his rented occupancy as his own? You jest. Those who are not intellectual nor sympathetic, perhaps, those who buys a property to live in and not as an “investment”, oka hypocrisy/gambling, house prices, oka Credit Crunch 2. To become [be] or to own [not to be] - there being no lizards other than those humans who looked like chameleons.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8

Trending Articles